<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Face, exposed</title>
	<link>http://www.exvigilare.com/2007/04/13/face-exposed/</link>
	<description>from vulgar Latin *exvigilare: Latin ex-, ex- + Latin vigilare, to stay awake, from vigil, awake</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 01:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Jacang Maher</title>
		<link>http://www.exvigilare.com/2007/04/13/face-exposed/#comment-1564</link>
		<author>Jared Jacang Maher</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.exvigilare.com/2007/04/13/face-exposed/#comment-1564</guid>
					<description>It's funny. I'm getting near identical criticism from bloggers on the left who say I was TOO nice to Brad. Oh well. But I do take issue with the statement that I don't like Mr. Facethestate. Please! I've been writing quite affectionately about his stunts since his bake sale days. We've also kept in regular contact. He's a hell of a much more entertaining interview than most of the self-satisfied liberal activists out there -- not to mention their pissy conservative counterparts -- who see anything less than a blatant blow-job article as an evidence of bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny. I&#8217;m getting near identical criticism from bloggers on the left who say I was TOO nice to Brad. Oh well. But I do take issue with the statement that I don&#8217;t like Mr. Facethestate. Please! I&#8217;ve been writing quite affectionately about his stunts since his bake sale days. We&#8217;ve also kept in regular contact. He&#8217;s a hell of a much more entertaining interview than most of the self-satisfied liberal activists out there &#8212; not to mention their pissy conservative counterparts &#8212; who see anything less than a blatant blow-job article as an evidence of bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RichieD</title>
		<link>http://www.exvigilare.com/2007/04/13/face-exposed/#comment-1565</link>
		<author>RichieD</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.exvigilare.com/2007/04/13/face-exposed/#comment-1565</guid>
					<description>Jared,

You're right - I made what I thought was a pretty safe assumption, but it was still a negative assumption. My apologies for painting with too broad a brush; ironically, what I thought you were doing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jared,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right - I made what I thought was a pretty safe assumption, but it was still a negative assumption. My apologies for painting with too broad a brush; ironically, what I thought you were doing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speak of the devil at exvigilare</title>
		<link>http://www.exvigilare.com/2007/04/13/face-exposed/#comment-1600</link>
		<author>Speak of the devil at exvigilare</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.exvigilare.com/2007/04/13/face-exposed/#comment-1600</guid>
					<description>[...] you know what I mean. Didn&#8217;t I just mention this? The University of Colorado&#8217;s College Republicans cooked up controversy and cookies Tuesday [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] you know what I mean. Didn&#8217;t I just mention this? The University of Colorado&#8217;s College Republicans cooked up controversy and cookies Tuesday [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeteSmith</title>
		<link>http://www.exvigilare.com/2007/04/13/face-exposed/#comment-1617</link>
		<author>PeteSmith</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.exvigilare.com/2007/04/13/face-exposed/#comment-1617</guid>
					<description>Agree with you that Tom's Colorado Index has some insightful commentary to keep an eye on.  Another is our KnowYourCOURTS.com for legal ethics related content that's previously wasn't available online.  Any implied opinion on that site is backed up by the documents right there, or it's not likely to get posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with you that Tom&#8217;s Colorado Index has some insightful commentary to keep an eye on.  Another is our KnowYourCOURTS.com for legal ethics related content that&#8217;s previously wasn&#8217;t available online.  Any implied opinion on that site is backed up by the documents right there, or it&#8217;s not likely to get posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
